🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.